DUI Court Decisions
There are a number of state and federal DUI court decisions that may affect the outcome of your drunk driving case, either favorably or unfavorably. If you have been arrested for drunk driving in Michigan, you need an experienced criminal defense lawyer who has a command of DUI court decisions and knows how to apply relevant DUI court cases to your advantage. You need a drunk driving defense attorney who works successfully with DUI/OWI law every day.
Criminal Defense Attorney Who Understands DUI Legal Definition
Michigan criminal defense attorney Paul Tafelski assists drivers charged with DUI, DWI, or OWI in Michigan, including, but not limited to Bloomfield Hills, West Bloomfield, Rochester Hills, Troy, Canton, Plymouth, Novi and Royal Oak, Oakland County, Wayne County and Macomb County.
Call (248) 451-2200 to speak today to a knowledgeable DUI arrest lawyer. For the quickest response at night or on weekends, please send an e-mail to Paul Tafelski’s cell phone or call him directly at 248-563-5305.
Some Relevant DUI Court Decisions May Apply to Your Drunk Driving Case
- Michigan Department of State Police vs. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990) – The Michigan case, which was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court, addressed the constitutionality of using DUI checkpoints along selected state roads to apprehend drunk drivers and explored the constitutional protection against unreasonable search and seizure.
- People v. Anstey, 476 Mich 436, 719 NW2d 579 (2006) — The case weakened the rights of drivers charged with OWI or alcohol-related offenses to have independent chemical testing under Michigan’s Implied Consent Law. Such tests may help build a strong defense for a DUI-charged driver.
- People v. Amine,_Mich App (Unpub, #294345, 12/21/2010) — The recent 2010 case decided by the Michigan Court of Appeals allowed the introduction of evidence about prior drunk driving convictions of the defendant under certain circumstances. The case involved a driver charged with OWI 3rd offense who claimed someone else was driving.
- People v. Vandervliet, 444 Mich 52, 74; 508 NW2d 114 (1993)—The decision established a three-step process for deciding whether to admit into evidence previous drunk driving convictions to avoid introduction of prejudicial evidence.
- Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)—This landmark constitutional case dealt with the use of statements obtained from suspects during police interrogation. It requires police to advise a defendant, such as an arrested drunk driver, of their “Miranda” rights, including the right to remain silent and not incriminate oneself and the right to have a DUI defense lawyer present during questioning.
There are other well-known Michigan drunk driving and criminal law decisions that may serve as precedents for your case once we know the specific facts of your case. Call us today for an evaluation of your case.
Call DUI Defense Lawyer to Discuss Your Case and Relevant DUI Court Decisions
If you face charges of drunk driving or OWI in Michigan, you need an experienced OWI defense lawyer who has a thorough command of on-point DUI court decisions and how they affect your case. Drunk driving defense attorney Paul J. Tafelski, P.C. has helped hundreds of clients navigate Michigan’s complicated court system.
A knowledgeable DUI defense lawyer, he knows the law and is skilled at challenging questionable evidence and junk science. He often is able to negotiate dismissals, plea bargains or sentencing agreements that allow clients to move on with their lives. Whether you made a mistake or have been wrongly charged, you need a skilled DUI defense advocate after a DUI / OWI arrest.
Call (248) 451-2200 to speak today to a knowledgeable DWI lawyer. For the quickest response at night or on weekends, please send an e-mail to Paul Tafelski’s cell phone or call him directly at 248-563-5305.
